https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335496 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to reject M/s ARK Synthetic Processors' refund claim for duty paid in March 2000, amounting to &8377; 65,000, due to the absence of a protest record for that specific month. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of indicating "under protest" on the TR-6 Challan for each month to validate refund claims, in line with the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the claim as time-barred. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Dec 2016 08:13:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335496 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision to reject M/s ARK Synthetic Processors' refund claim for duty paid in March 2000, amounting to &8377; 65,000, due to the absence of a protest record for that specific month. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of indicating "under protest" on the TR-6 Challan for each month to validate refund claims, in line with the decision in Mafatlal Industries Ltd. vs. Union of India. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the rejection of the claim as time-barred. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335496