<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 138 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335493</link>
    <description>Under the EPCG scheme, customs cannot finally determine non-fulfilment of export obligation before the licensing authority decides a pending discharge application, particularly where the obligation is linked to services and requires assessment within the licensing framework. The text also notes that exemption conditions must be applied reasonably: alleged personal use of imported vehicles, without an express requirement of exclusive use, and the absence of an installation certificate for movable cars did not justify confiscation, duty demand or penalties. The operative effect discussed is that notification conditions must be read in light of their purpose and practical feasibility, rather than by imposing impossible compliance standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2017 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 138 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335493</link>
      <description>Under the EPCG scheme, customs cannot finally determine non-fulfilment of export obligation before the licensing authority decides a pending discharge application, particularly where the obligation is linked to services and requires assessment within the licensing framework. The text also notes that exemption conditions must be applied reasonably: alleged personal use of imported vehicles, without an express requirement of exclusive use, and the absence of an installation certificate for movable cars did not justify confiscation, duty demand or penalties. The operative effect discussed is that notification conditions must be read in light of their purpose and practical feasibility, rather than by imposing impossible compliance standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>