<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335486</link>
    <description>An assessment based on a pre-assessment notice giving only three days to respond was found inadequate where the taxpayer needed time to produce records and object to disputed turnover additions. The assessment was therefore set aside in respect of the disputed turnover additions, interest and consequential penalty, and remitted for fresh consideration after granting further opportunity. The taxpayer&#039;s admitted liability for reversal of input tax credit on the accepted items was left undisturbed, as those admissions did not require interference. The operative effect is that only the admitted reversal component remains sustained, while the contested portions must be reconsidered after proper hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 06:46:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335486</link>
      <description>An assessment based on a pre-assessment notice giving only three days to respond was found inadequate where the taxpayer needed time to produce records and object to disputed turnover additions. The assessment was therefore set aside in respect of the disputed turnover additions, interest and consequential penalty, and remitted for fresh consideration after granting further opportunity. The taxpayer&#039;s admitted liability for reversal of input tax credit on the accepted items was left undisturbed, as those admissions did not require interference. The operative effect is that only the admitted reversal component remains sustained, while the contested portions must be reconsidered after proper hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>