<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335484</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the assessment order for the year 2014-15 under the TNVAT Act, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the importance of affording a personal hearing when requested and thorough verification of records, including the Bill Tallying System, to ensure compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2016 06:41:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 129 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335484</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the assessment order for the year 2014-15 under the TNVAT Act, and remanded the matter to the respondent for fresh consideration. The Court emphasized the importance of affording a personal hearing when requested and thorough verification of records, including the Bill Tallying System, to ensure compliance with natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>