<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335478</link>
    <description>A physically defined and commercially controlled event venue can constitute a fixed place permanent establishment where the foreign enterprise has exclusive access, preparatory and post-event use, and effective control over key commercial exploitation rights. A dependent agent permanent establishment was not established because the connected entities were not shown to habitually conclude contracts or otherwise meet the treaty test. Payments for the right to host, stage and promote the event were not royalty where any trademark or intellectual property use was merely incidental; the receipts were treated as business income. Once the income was chargeable to tax in India, tax was required to be withheld under Section 195.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2017 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 123 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335478</link>
      <description>A physically defined and commercially controlled event venue can constitute a fixed place permanent establishment where the foreign enterprise has exclusive access, preparatory and post-event use, and effective control over key commercial exploitation rights. A dependent agent permanent establishment was not established because the connected entities were not shown to habitually conclude contracts or otherwise meet the treaty test. Payments for the right to host, stage and promote the event were not royalty where any trademark or intellectual property use was merely incidental; the receipts were treated as business income. Once the income was chargeable to tax in India, tax was required to be withheld under Section 195.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>