<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335473</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice under Section 148 was invalid due to being issued beyond the permissible period of limitation. The Tribunal&#039;s observation was deemed not constituting a &quot;finding&quot; or &quot;direction&quot; under Section 150(1), thus rendering the reopening of the assessment unjustified. The Court granted the petitioner&#039;s prayer clause (a) without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:47:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450364" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 118 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335473</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the notice under Section 148 was invalid due to being issued beyond the permissible period of limitation. The Tribunal&#039;s observation was deemed not constituting a &quot;finding&quot; or &quot;direction&quot; under Section 150(1), thus rendering the reopening of the assessment unjustified. The Court granted the petitioner&#039;s prayer clause (a) without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>