<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 112 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335467</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned with a cost imposed on the assessee. The adhoc disallowance of expenses was reduced from 5% to a fixed amount of Rs. 1 lakh. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition related to the advance of Rs. 3 lakhs received against the sale of property, as it was returned to the buyer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 112 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335467</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed by the Tribunal. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned with a cost imposed on the assessee. The adhoc disallowance of expenses was reduced from 5% to a fixed amount of Rs. 1 lakh. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the addition related to the advance of Rs. 3 lakhs received against the sale of property, as it was returned to the buyer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>