<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 109 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335464</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 2,25,00,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 was without jurisdiction and beyond the scope of Section 153A, as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that in the case of completed assessments, additions could only be made based on seized material, following the decisions of the jurisdictional High Court and the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 109 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335464</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, holding that the addition of Rs. 2,25,00,000/- made by the AO under Section 68 was without jurisdiction and beyond the scope of Section 153A, as no incriminating material was found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that in the case of completed assessments, additions could only be made based on seized material, following the decisions of the jurisdictional High Court and the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>