<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 101 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335456</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order holding the assessee liable for tax, interest, and penalties, directing the original authority to reevaluate interest liability based on a strict application of Rule 14 and Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision emphasized verifying credit availability on due dates and ensuring compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules for accurate assessment of interest and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:23:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 101 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335456</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order holding the assessee liable for tax, interest, and penalties, directing the original authority to reevaluate interest liability based on a strict application of Rule 14 and Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The decision emphasized verifying credit availability on due dates and ensuring compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules for accurate assessment of interest and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>