https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188481 A condition prohibiting alienation attached to land granted under Rule 43-J of the Mysore Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1960 was valid and enforceable as part of the grant. The Court held that Rule 43-J was only an enabling provision and did not exclude the general grant conditions applicable to concessional or free grants. The absence of an express alienation clause in Rule 43-J did not nullify the restriction, and the marginal note to Rule 43-G could not override the text of the rule. Transfers made in breach of the grant condition were void under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978, and restoration proceedings were maintainable. en-us Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188481 A condition prohibiting alienation attached to land granted under Rule 43-J of the Mysore Land Revenue (Amendment) Rules, 1960 was valid and enforceable as part of the grant. The Court held that Rule 43-J was only an enabling provision and did not exclude the general grant conditions applicable to concessional or free grants. The absence of an express alienation clause in Rule 43-J did not nullify the restriction, and the marginal note to Rule 43-G could not override the text of the rule. Transfers made in breach of the grant condition were void under the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978, and restoration proceedings were maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188481