https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335428 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding the impugned order unsustainable due to lack of jurisdiction and erroneous application of customs provisions. Emphasizing the distinction between vessels and cargo, it ruled that the vessel's confiscation and duty demand were unfounded. The judgment stressed the significance of correct jurisdiction, adherence to customs rules, and accurate legal application in customs matters, providing relief to the appellants based on precedents and legal provisions. en-us Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Dec 2016 14:48:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335428 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, finding the impugned order unsustainable due to lack of jurisdiction and erroneous application of customs provisions. Emphasizing the distinction between vessels and cargo, it ruled that the vessel's confiscation and duty demand were unfounded. The judgment stressed the significance of correct jurisdiction, adherence to customs rules, and accurate legal application in customs matters, providing relief to the appellants based on precedents and legal provisions. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335428