https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335415 The court held that the reassessment order challenged by the petitioner did not breach natural justice. It was found that the Assessing Authority correctly applied a tax rate of 14.5% on mobile battery chargers, as per a Supreme Court precedent. The court directed the petitioner to pursue appeals through the Appellate Authority, except for the tax rate issue, which was settled. The petitioner was given four weeks to appeal without limitations, and no costs were imposed on the parties. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335415 The court held that the reassessment order challenged by the petitioner did not breach natural justice. It was found that the Assessing Authority correctly applied a tax rate of 14.5% on mobile battery chargers, as per a Supreme Court precedent. The court directed the petitioner to pursue appeals through the Appellate Authority, except for the tax rate issue, which was settled. The petitioner was given four weeks to appeal without limitations, and no costs were imposed on the parties. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335415