<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1111 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188457</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the Revenue&#039;s presumption of unaccounted cash payment lacked substantial evidence, criticizing the reliance on suspicion rather than concrete proof. It noted the absence of crucial details in the seized material and emphasized the lack of nexus between the respondent and the cash payment. The Court highlighted the assessing officer&#039;s failure to thoroughly investigate the property&#039;s actual value and establish the respondent&#039;s cash payment, ultimately finding no substantial legal question and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2018 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1111 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188457</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The Court agreed with the Tribunal that the Revenue&#039;s presumption of unaccounted cash payment lacked substantial evidence, criticizing the reliance on suspicion rather than concrete proof. It noted the absence of crucial details in the seized material and emphasized the lack of nexus between the respondent and the cash payment. The Court highlighted the assessing officer&#039;s failure to thoroughly investigate the property&#039;s actual value and establish the respondent&#039;s cash payment, ultimately finding no substantial legal question and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>