<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 54 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to Rs. 26.64 lakhs for interest expenditure and Rs. 14,79,411 for administrative expenses. The addition on account of the provision for wealth tax was deleted, following the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 54 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. The disallowance under Section 14A was restricted to Rs. 26.64 lakhs for interest expenditure and Rs. 14,79,411 for administrative expenses. The addition on account of the provision for wealth tax was deleted, following the jurisdictional High Court&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>