<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 42 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335397</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the Principal CIT&#039;s decision and allowed the depreciation claim on computers, finding that the business was set up during the year and the computers were ready for use. The appeal by the Assessee was partly allowed, with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The order was pronounced on 21st September 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 42 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335397</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the Principal CIT&#039;s decision and allowed the depreciation claim on computers, finding that the business was set up during the year and the computers were ready for use. The appeal by the Assessee was partly allowed, with the Tribunal&#039;s directions. The order was pronounced on 21st September 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>