<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal condoned the 1875-day delay in filing the appeal, admitting it due to the assessee&#039;s prompt actions. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Ld. CIT to amend the registration certificate to make it effective from 1st April, 2002, in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 41 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal condoned the 1875-day delay in filing the appeal, admitting it due to the assessee&#039;s prompt actions. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the Ld. CIT to amend the registration certificate to make it effective from 1st April, 2002, in line with the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>