<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1137 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188454</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made towards alleged on-money payments for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to prove that the assessee received on-money, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence to support the claim. As a result, the additions based on loose sheets and third-party statements were deemed unjustified and were consequently deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1137 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188454</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the additions made towards alleged on-money payments for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The Tribunal found that the Department failed to prove that the assessee received on-money, emphasizing the lack of corroborative evidence to support the claim. As a result, the additions based on loose sheets and third-party statements were deemed unjustified and were consequently deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>