<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 113 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188451</link>
    <description>The right to carry forward and set off losses is a substantive statutory right and must be exercised only under the law in force for the relevant period; an allowance made in disregard of the unamended provision and the Removal of Difficulties Order disclosed a patent mistake and was rightly rectified under section 35. The doctrine of merger applies only to matters actually carried in appeal: where the Revenue did not challenge that direction before the Tribunal, it did not merge in the appellate order, so the Appellate Assistant Commissioner retained jurisdiction to rectify it. The challenge to rectification therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 113 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188451</link>
      <description>The right to carry forward and set off losses is a substantive statutory right and must be exercised only under the law in force for the relevant period; an allowance made in disregard of the unamended provision and the Removal of Difficulties Order disclosed a patent mistake and was rightly rectified under section 35. The doctrine of merger applies only to matters actually carried in appeal: where the Revenue did not challenge that direction before the Tribunal, it did not merge in the appellate order, so the Appellate Assistant Commissioner retained jurisdiction to rectify it. The challenge to rectification therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>