<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 978 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188450</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of notices issued under section 131(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Valuation Officer for determining capital gains and income assessment. The Court affirmed the authority and competence of the Valuation Officer, emphasizing the importance of fair market value determination for tax assessments. The petitions challenging the notices were dismissed, ruling that the Valuation Officer&#039;s actions were valid and in compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:32:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450167" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 978 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188450</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of notices issued under section 131(1)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Valuation Officer for determining capital gains and income assessment. The Court affirmed the authority and competence of the Valuation Officer, emphasizing the importance of fair market value determination for tax assessments. The petitions challenging the notices were dismissed, ruling that the Valuation Officer&#039;s actions were valid and in compliance with principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>