<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 30 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335385</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on copper rods sent to job workers could not be denied merely because part of the inputs was not received back in full, where the manufacturing process necessarily involved loss, end cuttings and scrap/off-cuts. The record showed that the retained scrap was used by the job worker to manufacture other goods, which were accounted for and cleared on payment of excise duty, with no evidence of diversion, unaccounted clearance or use of the inputs as such in breach of the job-work arrangement. On these facts, reversal of credit was not justified, and the connected confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 30 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335385</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on copper rods sent to job workers could not be denied merely because part of the inputs was not received back in full, where the manufacturing process necessarily involved loss, end cuttings and scrap/off-cuts. The record showed that the retained scrap was used by the job worker to manufacture other goods, which were accounted for and cleared on payment of excise duty, with no evidence of diversion, unaccounted clearance or use of the inputs as such in breach of the job-work arrangement. On these facts, reversal of credit was not justified, and the connected confiscation and penalties were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>