<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 26 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335381</link>
    <description>Interest on delayed refund of a pre-deposit becomes payable where the refund is not sanctioned within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s final order. The amount was treated as a pre-deposit made during investigation, not as regular duty payment, so the three-month period for refund applied. The absence of a separate claim did not defeat interest, because liability arises automatically for delay beyond the prescribed period. Interest was therefore payable from three months after the final order until the refund was actually sanctioned and paid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450153" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 26 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335381</link>
      <description>Interest on delayed refund of a pre-deposit becomes payable where the refund is not sanctioned within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s final order. The amount was treated as a pre-deposit made during investigation, not as regular duty payment, so the three-month period for refund applied. The absence of a separate claim did not defeat interest, because liability arises automatically for delay beyond the prescribed period. Interest was therefore payable from three months after the final order until the refund was actually sanctioned and paid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>