<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 1067 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188440</link>
    <description>The Tax Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) in two cases where Rs. 19,00,000 additions were made based on seized documents. The Tribunal found the unsigned debit notes insufficient as conclusive evidence for the additions and noted the lack of supporting material found during the search. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed both tax appeals, as it found no legal issues and concluded that no substantial questions of law arose from the cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:52:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 1067 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188440</link>
      <description>The Tax Tribunal upheld the decisions of the Commissioner (Appeals) in two cases where Rs. 19,00,000 additions were made based on seized documents. The Tribunal found the unsigned debit notes insufficient as conclusive evidence for the additions and noted the lack of supporting material found during the search. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed both tax appeals, as it found no legal issues and concluded that no substantial questions of law arose from the cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>