<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 16 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335371</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for the CENVAT credit availed on MS items as the Mezannine floor, made using MS items, was integral to the manufacturing process. The penalty imposed on the reversed credit was set aside, while the demand for reversal was upheld. The appeal was allowed partly with specified reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:27:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 16 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335371</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was eligible for the CENVAT credit availed on MS items as the Mezannine floor, made using MS items, was integral to the manufacturing process. The penalty imposed on the reversed credit was set aside, while the demand for reversal was upheld. The appeal was allowed partly with specified reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>