<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 15 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the eligibility of input service tax credit for constructions such as compound wall, rest room, toilet, security room, overhead tank, and road laying activities in the factory premises, emphasizing their necessity for factory operations. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order based on the integral nature of the constructions to the manufacturing process and compliance with relevant legal clarifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 15 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the eligibility of input service tax credit for constructions such as compound wall, rest room, toilet, security room, overhead tank, and road laying activities in the factory premises, emphasizing their necessity for factory operations. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order based on the integral nature of the constructions to the manufacturing process and compliance with relevant legal clarifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>