https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188423 The article discusses a Gujarat High Court habeas corpus matter concerning arrest and custody under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It states that the second petition was treated as maintainable because the Supreme Court's orders preserved future proceedings and habeas corpus is not barred by constructive res judicata in the same way as civil litigation. It further records that the Court found prima facie non-compliance with the applicable Code of Criminal Procedure safeguards and Article 21, and held that section 45 of the PMLA could not override constitutional protection. Statements recorded after arrest were also treated as incapable of sustaining continued custody, leading to interim release pending final decision. en-us Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:20:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188423 The article discusses a Gujarat High Court habeas corpus matter concerning arrest and custody under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. It states that the second petition was treated as maintainable because the Supreme Court's orders preserved future proceedings and habeas corpus is not barred by constructive res judicata in the same way as civil litigation. It further records that the Court found prima facie non-compliance with the applicable Code of Criminal Procedure safeguards and Article 21, and held that section 45 of the PMLA could not override constitutional protection. Statements recorded after arrest were also treated as incapable of sustaining continued custody, leading to interim release pending final decision. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188423