<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 7 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335362</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) for the Assessment Year 1999-2000, reducing it from Rs. 1,80,000 to Rs. 50,000, as the goods were imported from Indore to evade tax, conflicting with the driver&#039;s statement and documents. Additionally, the Court affirmed the reduction in turnover of imported refined oil from Rs. 70 lacs to Rs. 17 lacs, as it was deemed an evaded sale based on evidence, leading to the dismissal of both revisions with penalties upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 7 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335362</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the penalty under section 15-A(1)(o) for the Assessment Year 1999-2000, reducing it from Rs. 1,80,000 to Rs. 50,000, as the goods were imported from Indore to evade tax, conflicting with the driver&#039;s statement and documents. Additionally, the Court affirmed the reduction in turnover of imported refined oil from Rs. 70 lacs to Rs. 17 lacs, as it was deemed an evaded sale based on evidence, leading to the dismissal of both revisions with penalties upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>