<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1370 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335352</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s decision on the satisfaction note under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the need to interpret expressions in documents contextually and not overly technically. The case was remanded to the ITAT for a fresh hearing on merits, without being influenced by the High Court&#039;s observations on the contentions of the parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1370 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335352</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s decision on the satisfaction note under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized the need to interpret expressions in documents contextually and not overly technically. The case was remanded to the ITAT for a fresh hearing on merits, without being influenced by the High Court&#039;s observations on the contentions of the parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>