https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188417 A transferee pendente lite who purchased suit property during long-pending litigation without leave of court is bound by lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and has no absolute right to be impleaded or to seek amendment of the pleadings. While such a transferee may be joined to protect an interest in the property, impleadment is discretionary and not automatic. The trial court's refusal was sustained because it gave cogent reasons, including the absence of prior leave and the apparent risk of delay and complication in the pending suits. The revisional court was justified in declining interference. en-us Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188417 A transferee pendente lite who purchased suit property during long-pending litigation without leave of court is bound by lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act and has no absolute right to be impleaded or to seek amendment of the pleadings. While such a transferee may be joined to protect an interest in the property, impleadment is discretionary and not automatic. The trial court's refusal was sustained because it gave cogent reasons, including the absence of prior leave and the apparent risk of delay and complication in the pending suits. The revisional court was justified in declining interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188417