https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked authority to allot the land, and the appellants did not establish their lawful entitlement to the land. The Court emphasized that interference with the impugned order would restore orders not in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415 The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, affirming that the Sub-Divisional Officer lacked authority to allot the land, and the appellants did not establish their lawful entitlement to the land. The Court emphasized that interference with the impugned order would restore orders not in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415