https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415 The allotment and transfer of Government land were invalid because the appellants failed to show any lawful authority in the Sub-Divisional Officer to make the allotment; the officer could only execute the lease deed on behalf of the Governor. The writ petition also lacked the foundational facts needed to support a claim of valid allotment. A technical breach of natural justice did not justify interference, because setting aside the impugned order would have revived earlier orders that were themselves illegal and without jurisdiction. In Article 226 jurisdiction, the court declined to resurrect an order that had no legal basis. The refusal to interfere was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:11:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415 The allotment and transfer of Government land were invalid because the appellants failed to show any lawful authority in the Sub-Divisional Officer to make the allotment; the officer could only execute the lease deed on behalf of the Governor. The writ petition also lacked the foundational facts needed to support a claim of valid allotment. A technical breach of natural justice did not justify interference, because setting aside the impugned order would have revived earlier orders that were themselves illegal and without jurisdiction. In Article 226 jurisdiction, the court declined to resurrect an order that had no legal basis. The refusal to interfere was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188415