<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 655 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188412</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Court upheld the revocation of approval for GSM based Cellular Telephone Services due to lack of security clearance. The Single Judge deemed the decision to revoke security clearance as satisfactory, citing the need to protect confidential sources of information. The Court affirmed that lack of security clearance was a valid reason for revocation and rejected the appellants&#039; plea for disclosure of information. The Court found no evidence of mala fides or victimization in the decision-making process and denied the appellants&#039; request for further inquiry based on additional documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 655 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188412</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Court upheld the revocation of approval for GSM based Cellular Telephone Services due to lack of security clearance. The Single Judge deemed the decision to revoke security clearance as satisfactory, citing the need to protect confidential sources of information. The Court affirmed that lack of security clearance was a valid reason for revocation and rejected the appellants&#039; plea for disclosure of information. The Court found no evidence of mala fides or victimization in the decision-making process and denied the appellants&#039; request for further inquiry based on additional documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188412</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>