<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1352 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant for eligible input services. The appellant was deemed eligible for credit on most services except Rent-a-cab services, which were utilized post-01.04.2011. The issue of missing service provider names was resolved in favor of the appellant after verification. The decision provided consequential reliefs as necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1352 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, granting relief to the appellant for eligible input services. The appellant was deemed eligible for credit on most services except Rent-a-cab services, which were utilized post-01.04.2011. The issue of missing service provider names was resolved in favor of the appellant after verification. The decision provided consequential reliefs as necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>