https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188411 The Supreme Court analyzed the interpretation of section 19(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVII of 1947, focusing on whether the accused's actions constituted relinquishment of tenancy. The court found that there was no actual relinquishment as per the statutory definition, leading to the setting aside of the conviction. The fine imposed was ordered to be refunded if already paid, while other aspects of the lower court's order regarding the sums exchanged were upheld. en-us Fri, 01 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:07:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188411 The Supreme Court analyzed the interpretation of section 19(1) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, LVII of 1947, focusing on whether the accused's actions constituted relinquishment of tenancy. The court found that there was no actual relinquishment as per the statutory definition, leading to the setting aside of the conviction. The fine imposed was ordered to be refunded if already paid, while other aspects of the lower court's order regarding the sums exchanged were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Feb 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188411