<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1347 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335329</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Order-in-Original and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice. It directed that if Dr. N.K. Batra&#039;s report is relied upon, an experiment must be conducted at the factory premises to determine actual electricity consumption. The court criticized procedural lapses, including the failure to provide crucial documents and conduct necessary experiments, and highlighted the inadequacy of evidence provided by the respondents to prove allegations of clandestine removal of M.S. Ingots.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:03:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1347 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335329</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Order-in-Original and remanded the case for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence and adherence to principles of natural justice. It directed that if Dr. N.K. Batra&#039;s report is relied upon, an experiment must be conducted at the factory premises to determine actual electricity consumption. The court criticized procedural lapses, including the failure to provide crucial documents and conduct necessary experiments, and highlighted the inadequacy of evidence provided by the respondents to prove allegations of clandestine removal of M.S. Ingots.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>