<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335324</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Revenue. The Tribunal determined that the valuation of intermediate products manufactured on a job work basis for the principal manufacturer should be based on the value at which the principal manufacturer sells the goods, in line with established valuation principles and previous judicial decisions. The Tribunal found Rule 10 A of Valuation Rules, 2000, inapplicable and emphasized the interpretation of Rule 8 in this context.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:03:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1342 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335324</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the duty demand and penalty imposed by the Revenue. The Tribunal determined that the valuation of intermediate products manufactured on a job work basis for the principal manufacturer should be based on the value at which the principal manufacturer sells the goods, in line with established valuation principles and previous judicial decisions. The Tribunal found Rule 10 A of Valuation Rules, 2000, inapplicable and emphasized the interpretation of Rule 8 in this context.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>