<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CENVAT Credit Valid Despite Lack of Storage Facility; Landlord Confirms Godown Rental to Dealer.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32284</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit - it cannot be alleged against the appellant that they have received the invoices and not the goods merely on the ground that there was not storage facility specifically when the landlord made a statement that the godown was let out to the dealer. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:58:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CENVAT Credit Valid Despite Lack of Storage Facility; Landlord Confirms Godown Rental to Dealer.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32284</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit - it cannot be alleged against the appellant that they have received the invoices and not the goods merely on the ground that there was not storage facility specifically when the landlord made a statement that the godown was let out to the dealer. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:58:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>