<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1333 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335315</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal for cenvat credit on construction services was remanded for verification of service location. Credit was denied for missing invoices. Verification of service provider addresses was required for credit eligibility. Charges for negotiation services were pending examination. Verification was needed for credit on pre-01.04.2011 services. Courier services post-01.04.2011 required verification, with credit acknowledged for pre-01.04.2011. Credit was allowed for invoices with handwritten registration numbers. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal remanded for lawful order issuance, emphasizing verification and legal precedent adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=450015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1333 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335315</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s appeal for cenvat credit on construction services was remanded for verification of service location. Credit was denied for missing invoices. Verification of service provider addresses was required for credit eligibility. Charges for negotiation services were pending examination. Verification was needed for credit on pre-01.04.2011 services. Courier services post-01.04.2011 required verification, with credit acknowledged for pre-01.04.2011. Credit was allowed for invoices with handwritten registration numbers. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal remanded for lawful order issuance, emphasizing verification and legal precedent adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>