https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188408 Partial surrender of part of a tenancy does not end the entire tenancy, and a continuing occupant may retain statutory protection where possession of the remaining premises continues. A mere reduction in area or rent does not, by itself, create a fresh tenancy. By contrast, a receiver can create only rights consistent with the court's injunction, so a tenancy granted in breach of that restraint is ineffective against the court order and does not attract protection under the premises tenancy law. The existing tenant's protection was sustained, while the occupant inducted in breach of the injunction was liable to eviction. en-us Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:17:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188408 Partial surrender of part of a tenancy does not end the entire tenancy, and a continuing occupant may retain statutory protection where possession of the remaining premises continues. A mere reduction in area or rent does not, by itself, create a fresh tenancy. By contrast, a receiver can create only rights consistent with the court's injunction, so a tenancy granted in breach of that restraint is ineffective against the court order and does not attract protection under the premises tenancy law. The existing tenant's protection was sustained, while the occupant inducted in breach of the injunction was liable to eviction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 02 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188408