https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335307 The tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-quantifying the duty by determining the assessable value under Rule 8. The appeal was disposed of by remand, upholding penalties and confiscation of goods due to willful misstatement and suppression of facts by the Appellant. The tribunal found no issues with the adjudicating authority's decisions on penalties and confiscation. en-us Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 11:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335307 The tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for re-quantifying the duty by determining the assessable value under Rule 8. The appeal was disposed of by remand, upholding penalties and confiscation of goods due to willful misstatement and suppression of facts by the Appellant. The tribunal found no issues with the adjudicating authority's decisions on penalties and confiscation. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335307