<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188407</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision to enhance the value of Copra Expeller Cake, citing lack of legal justification and arbitrary nature of the orders. Discrepancies in comparing imports at different ports without considering quality and quantity led to the conclusion that the Revenue&#039;s actions were unsustainable. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting consequential benefits as applicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:14:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1004 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188407</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Revenue&#039;s decision to enhance the value of Copra Expeller Cake, citing lack of legal justification and arbitrary nature of the orders. Discrepancies in comparing imports at different ports without considering quality and quantity led to the conclusion that the Revenue&#039;s actions were unsustainable. Relying on precedents, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting consequential benefits as applicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>