<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1127 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188399</link>
    <description>The ITAT Pune dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that the initial assessment year for claiming deductions under Section 80IA should be the year chosen by the assessee, in line with judicial precedents. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4)(iv)(a) was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1127 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188399</link>
      <description>The ITAT Pune dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal affirmed that the initial assessment year for claiming deductions under Section 80IA should be the year chosen by the assessee, in line with judicial precedents. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s claim for deductions under Section 80IA(4)(iv)(a) was allowed, and the CIT(A)&#039;s order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>