<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1083 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188400</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1 crore to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and improper reliance on a retracted disclosure made under alleged coercion. It confirmed that additions cannot be solely based on uncorroborated statements obtained during search operations, supporting the principle established in various case laws referenced by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:14:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1083 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188400</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1 crore to the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and improper reliance on a retracted disclosure made under alleged coercion. It confirmed that additions cannot be solely based on uncorroborated statements obtained during search operations, supporting the principle established in various case laws referenced by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>