https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188403 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appellant's appeal with modifications. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, but penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were upheld. The Tribunal considered the appellant's compliance with tax payments before and after the notice, leading to adjustments in the penalties imposed by the original adjudicating authority and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The impugned orders were modified to reflect the Tribunal's decision, providing clarity on the penalties to be imposed. en-us Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 14:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188403 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appellant's appeal with modifications. The penalty under Section 78 was set aside, but penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were upheld. The Tribunal considered the appellant's compliance with tax payments before and after the notice, leading to adjustments in the penalties imposed by the original adjudicating authority and confirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The impugned orders were modified to reflect the Tribunal's decision, providing clarity on the penalties to be imposed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188403