<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1703 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188396</link>
    <description>The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held not to confer exclusive investigative jurisdiction on the Enforcement Directorate over scheduled offences; its distinct domain is the offence of money-laundering and the connected powers of attachment, adjudication and prosecution. The ordinary power of a competent investigating agency to investigate the underlying IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act offences was therefore preserved. As the material also disclosed allegations of abuse of official position and illegal acquisition of assets, investigation by the CBI was justified, and the direction continuing that investigation was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1703 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188396</link>
      <description>The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was held not to confer exclusive investigative jurisdiction on the Enforcement Directorate over scheduled offences; its distinct domain is the offence of money-laundering and the connected powers of attachment, adjudication and prosecution. The ordinary power of a competent investigating agency to investigate the underlying IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act offences was therefore preserved. As the material also disclosed allegations of abuse of official position and illegal acquisition of assets, investigation by the CBI was justified, and the direction continuing that investigation was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>