<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1948 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188391</link>
    <description>The court held that the income from the sale of Sal trees could be treated as agricultural income under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944. The court concluded that the land was used for agricultural purposes due to the regular forestry operations, which involved significant human efforts. The question was answered in the affirmative, with each party bearing its own costs. Justice DAS concurred with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 14:52:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1948 (1) TMI 24 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188391</link>
      <description>The court held that the income from the sale of Sal trees could be treated as agricultural income under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944. The court concluded that the land was used for agricultural purposes due to the regular forestry operations, which involved significant human efforts. The question was answered in the affirmative, with each party bearing its own costs. Justice DAS concurred with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 1948 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>