<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335290</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refund the tax paid on the disclosed but unshown income of Rs. 15 lakhs. The decision was based on the lack of correlation between the disclosed income and seized material, following precedents where vague and conditional disclosures did not warrant additions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence before making such additions and concluded that the refund should be granted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1308 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335290</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to refund the tax paid on the disclosed but unshown income of Rs. 15 lakhs. The decision was based on the lack of correlation between the disclosed income and seized material, following precedents where vague and conditional disclosures did not warrant additions. The Tribunal emphasized the need for concrete evidence before making such additions and concluded that the refund should be granted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>