<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335289</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal only to the extent of reallocating the insurance expense to project costs. The appeals were partly allowed, with deletions of disallowance of various expenses and gifts, as well as the addition on account of interest being upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:51:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1307 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335289</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, allowing the revenue&#039;s appeal only to the extent of reallocating the insurance expense to project costs. The appeals were partly allowed, with deletions of disallowance of various expenses and gifts, as well as the addition on account of interest being upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>