<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335277</link>
    <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the addition of Rs. 78,45,882 representing balances of Sundry Creditors due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove their genuineness. However, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Rs. 4,60,000 as profit element on advances against the sale of flats, adjusting the estimated profit rate to 5% instead of the initially proposed 20%.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 17:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1295 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335277</link>
      <description>The ITAT Kolkata upheld the addition of Rs. 78,45,882 representing balances of Sundry Creditors due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove their genuineness. However, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of Rs. 4,60,000 as profit element on advances against the sale of flats, adjusting the estimated profit rate to 5% instead of the initially proposed 20%.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>