https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335272 The tribunal confirmed the service tax liability for the construction of residential complex services for a specific period but set aside the penalty due to confusion in taxability. For the prior period, the tribunal upheld the demand with interest and imposed a penalty of 10,000 under section 77 of the Finance Act for the appellant's failure to deposit collected tax, deeming it as an intention to enrich themselves. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:43:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335272 The tribunal confirmed the service tax liability for the construction of residential complex services for a specific period but set aside the penalty due to confusion in taxability. For the prior period, the tribunal upheld the demand with interest and imposed a penalty of 10,000 under section 77 of the Finance Act for the appellant's failure to deposit collected tax, deeming it as an intention to enrich themselves. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335272