<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1288 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335270</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore, allowed the appeal by M/s. Dr. Reddy&#039;s Laboratories Ltd., setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding rebate claims. The Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment impacted the recovery order, leading to the CESTAT setting aside the recovery demand. The CESTAT upheld its decision, declaring the recovery demand for rebate as illegal in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1288 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335270</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore, allowed the appeal by M/s. Dr. Reddy&#039;s Laboratories Ltd., setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding rebate claims. The Delhi High Court&#039;s judgment impacted the recovery order, leading to the CESTAT setting aside the recovery demand. The CESTAT upheld its decision, declaring the recovery demand for rebate as illegal in line with the Delhi High Court&#039;s ruling, dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=335270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>