https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188383 Arbitral awards are subject to only limited judicial interference: correction is confined to clerical or formal errors, remission to matters left undetermined, and setting aside to corruption, misconduct, or an error of law apparent on the face of the award. Mere allegations of factual mistake, inequity, or poor appreciation of evidence do not justify reappraisal of the merits. The Court found no erroneous legal proposition in the award or incorporated documents, and rejected the challenge. It also held that the workers' gratuity claim had been sufficiently recognised and provided for, so the award was not incomplete. The award was upheld and made the rule of the Court. en-us Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 10:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188383 Arbitral awards are subject to only limited judicial interference: correction is confined to clerical or formal errors, remission to matters left undetermined, and setting aside to corruption, misconduct, or an error of law apparent on the face of the award. Mere allegations of factual mistake, inequity, or poor appreciation of evidence do not justify reappraisal of the merits. The Court found no erroneous legal proposition in the award or incorporated documents, and rejected the challenge. It also held that the workers' gratuity claim had been sufficiently recognised and provided for, so the award was not incomplete. The award was upheld and made the rule of the Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188383